|
Vertical Divider
|
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
The Christ-centered, Spirit-filled gatherings of the early New Testament church were recognized by a distinct practice. It was characterized by the celebration of the Lord’s Supper as a full meal in the intimacy of small group community. The distinct practice was interactive, intergenerational, and moved from house to house.
Lord’s Supper The early New Testament church originally assembled in a large group setting in the precincts of the Jewish temple to hear the teaching of the apostles. It provided them with the privileged opportunity to learn the fundamentals of their new faith. As the day progressed, the early church gathered in smaller, more intimate groups from house to house. The primary activity of the house-to-house gatherings of the early church was the celebration of the Lord’s Supper. (cf. Matthew 26:26; Acts 2:46; 20:7; 1 Corinthians 10:16; 11:17-34) The Book of Jude referred to it as the “Agape Feast” or “Love Feast” (Jude 12). For a number of reasons, the “breaking of bread” referred to the celebration of the Lord’s Supper as a full meal. (Acts 2:46) Not only is Jude 12 a likely reference to the Lord's Supper as a full meal, it is further indicated by the context of 1 Corinthians 11:17-34. Moreover, the New Testament Greek word translated as “supper” is deipnon (dipe'-non). It is used 16 times in the New Testament, never once for anything less than a full meal. The other activities of the early New Testament church took place during their celebration of the Lord’s Supper as a full meal. For example, the gathered were moved by the fullness and fellowship of the Spirit to worship in song; give thanks; submit to one another; engage in spiritually gifted ministry to one another; pray; etc. (Acts 2:42, 46; 1 Corinthians 11:1-14:40; 2 Corinthians 13:14; Ephesians 5:18-21; Philippians 2:1; Colossians 3:16) The practice of the Lord’s Supper as a full meal was foreshadowed by the Jewish Passover (Exodus 12:1-28, 43-49; Deuteronomy 16:1-8) and the Lord’s “Last Supper” (Matthew 26:26-30; Mark 14:22-26; Luke 22:14-20). Its purpose will be fulfilled in the future by the heavenly “Marriage Supper of the Lamb.” (Revelation 19:7-10) In addition, the Lord’s Supper celebrated as a full meal was the sign of the redemptive Eternal Covenant. The meal was intended to represent the bountiful overflow of covenantal life (zoe). It constituted the celebration of life (zoe) in the highest shared with Jesus Christ. |
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
Small Group Community
Concordant with apostolic tradition, the New Testament presented only the small group environment for the collective gatherings of the church. It was further reinforced by church history. The entire New Testament was written in the context of intimate, small group, team-based community. Thus, when the ecclesia of God is removed from its small group context much of the ecclesiology of the New Testament becomes senseless. The large group setting for the New Testament church cannot effectively accommodate the celebration of the Lord’s Supper as a full meal, the spiritually gifted ministry of every member, loving church discipline or team-based spiritual conflict and outreach. It is illogical for such life-based (zoe) practices. Consequently, the ecclesiology of the New Testament must be twisted to fit the church into the context of a large group meeting. The unfortunate truth is that when church gatherings are unnaturally forced into a large group setting the New Testament church becomes spiritually unfruitful. Its fruitlessness is related to its legalistic approach to church life. While the intimacy of a small group community is conducive for the rule of divine life (zoe), the businesslike environment of the large group setting is not. The management of a large group of human beings is essentially an impersonal endeavor that is naturally facilitated by the rule of law. The rule of law, however, is contrary to the life-based (zoe) practices of the church. Forcing the church into the legal environment of a religious large group serves to quench the Spirit of life (zoe) and consequently, render it spiritually fruitless. Leaning on the lifeless (zoe), legalistic practice of religion, the Lord’s Supper naturally changes from a celebration to a solemn ceremony. Thus, the opportunity for every member ministry becomes extinct. The purpose for church discipline is radically changed from correction to punishment. In addition, spiritual conflict and outreach are no longer approached as a team by faith in the incomparable power of Christ. Instead, they are largely ignored. The practice of the New Testament church was not designed to be legalistically performed for God under the rule of law. Instead, it was predetermined to be fulfilled with Him through faith by the gracious rule of His indwelling life (zoe). Graciously obligated to God by the rule of His indwelling life (zoe), the members of each small group community of the early New Testament church were privileged to celebrate the Lord’s Supper together as a full meal, minister to one another according to the gracious gifting of the Spirit and grow together through loving discipline. In spiritual conflict, they could faithfully and prayerfully stand firm together in the fullness of the protective armor of Jesus Christ. In addition, the small group communities of the early church were most suitable for team-based outreach to the unbelieving world. The New Testament church manifested in small group community was reinforced by early church history. Within two years after its founding in Jerusalem, large group meetings were abandoned. For the 300 years that ensued, the ecclesia assembled only in small group community. It alone was accommodative of life-based (zoe) church practice that was Christ-centered and Spirit-filled. In contrast, the law-based, large group meetings of the “church” in special buildings did not become the norm until the fourth century. It was the result of radical governmental policies initiated by the Roman Emperor Constantine. Historically, the intimate small group environment was effective for the accommodation of a Christ-centered, Spirit-filled, celebratory gatherings for the following reasons: |
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
Both the New Testament and church history clarify that small group community presented the environment most favorable for Christ-centered, Spirit-filled church gatherings. Conducive for nurturing intimacy, the early ecclesia was able to recognize Jesus not only as heavenly Lord but as the immediate, active head of their community on earth.
Interactive Community According to biblical pattern, the members of the New Testament church were not merely intended to sit passively and receive instruction about God. Instead, its Christ-centered, Spirit-filled gatherings were predesigned to be dynamic, characterized by interaction between Christ and His body. The dynamic interaction between Christ and the members of His body emphasized teamwork. It was inclusive and interactive, involving every member of collective church gatherings. Christ indwelling, gifting, empowering, and using every member of His body was normative for the New Testament church. It was a fundamental characteristic of Christ-centered gatherings and supportive of the doctrine of the priesthood of every believer. (1 Peter 2:9; Revelation 1:6, 5:10, 20:6) The cooperative involvement of every member contributed to the vitality and growth of the church. (Ephesians 4:11-16; cf. Romans 12:4-13; Colossians 2:19) The dynamic, interactive gatherings of the New Testament church were recognized by ministry that was reciprocal. Christ ministered eternal life (zoe) to His body. He was the source of fulfillment for its every need. In turn, every member of the gathered church body was blessed to reciprocate Christ’s ministry of eternal life (zoe), not only to Him personally but to the other members of His body. In Christ, overflowing with the fullness of His Spirit, each person gathered was uniquely equipped with a privileged, gifted ministry through which they could faithfully bless Christ and His body. The “one-another” ministries of the New Testament are reflective of the interactive, team-based practice of the gathered ecclesia: |
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
Intergenerational Community
The small group gatherings of the early New Testament church were not only interactive but intergenerational. Thus, they were inclusive of people from every age group. In contrast to the large group meetings of the modern, religious church, the early church’s intimate, small group environment was favorable for the inclusion of children. Family-oriented, it was designed to contribute to the edification of both adults and children. The collective assembly of the early New Testament church constituted the intentional gathering of a loving family under divine headship. Therefore, adults and children alike were graciously allowed to enjoy the living (zoe) presence of their Lord and Savior, experience His edifying power, and fulfill His eternal purpose. Today, children of all ages can participate in most, if not all, of the activities associated with New Testament church gatherings. For example, they can eat with the adults. Further, while the younger children may not yet be ready to share the bread and cup, they most certainly can enjoy the food associated with the rest of the meal. In addition, children can participate through worship in song, prayer, fellowship, and, to a limited extent, interactive ministry. Younger children may not have the patience to last through an entire gathering of the collective church. It is prudent, however, that they remain as long as possible. It provides them with the opportunity to witness the loving ministry of Christ and, as demonstrated by the adults and older children, the submission of the small group community to His immediate, active headship. Distraction from the preeminence of Christ in the collective assemblies of the New Testament church is common. It occurs not only to children but adults as well. The living Christ alone, however, is worthy of the attention and adoration of His gathered church body. Therefore, it is a continual and critical necessity in the interactive, intergenerational, house to house gatherings of the church to engage in the good fight of faith to preserve and protect the preeminence of Christ. |
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
House to House Community
“Day by day continuing with one mind in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house; they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of heart, praising God and having favor with all the people.” (Acts 2:46-47) For approximately two years, the early New Testament church assembled in a large group setting in the ancient ruins of Solomon’s Temple. They also gathered in the intimacy of the small group setting from house to house. The large group meetings of the early church in the ruins of the temple were short-lived. They were exclusive to the origination of the ecclesia on earth. The temporary large group meetings of the early church allowed the apostles to teach thousands of new believers the fundamentals of the faith. However, while important to the founding of the ecclesia on earth, the large group setting was not considered expedient for its growth beyond Jerusalem. Within two years of its initiation on earth, God allowed persecution to drive the early New Testament church from Jerusalem. For the next 300 years, the ecclesia assembled only in small group community from house to house. (cf. Acts 2:46; 5:42; 8:3; 12:12; 20:20; Romans 16:5; 1 Corinthians 16:19; Colossians 4:15; Philemon 2) The New Testament does not reference any large group gatherings of the early church outside of Jerusalem. Instead, its entire ecclesiology was written in the context of an intimate small group environment. The small group setting from house to house was effective for accommodating the church in the form of a spiritual body and consequently, the spiritual life (zoe) of God on earth. Further, it was efficacious for facilitating Christ-centered, Spirit-filled gatherings. The small group setting from house to house was simple, timeless, mobile, flexible, cross-cultural, and easily multiplied. Movement from house to house also provided important safeguards. First, it helped to keep Christ central by not allowing any individual homeowner to appear more important than another. Second, moving from house to house assisted in preventing any single participant or family from asserting control over the affairs of the group. Third, it was conducive for the nurture of community. Gathering in the homes of every member of the ecclesia cultivated the opportunity for ministry. It revealed how group members lived, what they valued, etc. As a result, gathering from house-to-house furnished insight for meeting both physical and spiritual needs. Fourth, it served to increase intimacy between the members of the community. Moving from house to house protected the unity of the faith by deepening friendships and encouraging mutual spiritual growth. Fifth, it allowed opportunity for outreach to new neighborhoods. Sixth, moving from house to house did not allow the burden of preparation to fall on one family. Seventh, it had the potential to keep the ecclesia sheltered from opposition. From house to house, the primary practice of the early New Testament church involved the celebration of the Lord’s Supper as a full meal. Intimate, interactive, and intergenerational, it presented an environment and practice that was most conducive for Christ to remain central to His body by the fullness of His indwelling Spirit. The Christ-centered, Spirit-filled small group gatherings of the early New Testament ecclesia were anything but boring. To the contrary, overflowing with the living (zoe) presence, edifying power, and ministering purpose of Jesus Christ they were a dynamic, joyful celebration. © 2025 James Hiatt |
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
|
|
Vertical Divider
|
|